Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dig BMX
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dig BMX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article, seems a bit adverty, also doesn't appear to meet WP:PERIODICAL Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nothing I could find would rise to the level of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so I can't see how this would meet WP:GNG, WP:PERIODICAL or WP:CORPDEPTH. Stalwart111 12:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no notability. SL93 (talk) 20:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.